Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 01:42

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
How Mark Walter’s billions could help the Lakers gain an edge on the court - Silver Screen and Roll
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What are some of the craziest laws around the world?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Insmed Stock Soars on Experimental Hypertension Drug Trial Results - Barron's
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Main distributor to Amazon’s Whole Foods hit by cyber attack - ft.com
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Eli Lilly’s Obesity Pill Appears to Work as Well as Injected GLP-1s - WIRED
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Hailey Bieber Steps Out Solo in an Emerald Minidress After Ditching Her Wedding Ring - instyle.com